3D-stelae ASOR Punic Project :: 3D Scanning Initiative
  A S O R   P u n i c   P r o j e c t

 3D DIGITAL MODELLING

 1875 SESQUICENTENNIAL — 150ᵗʰ ANNIVERSARY

 dramatis personae

  These early archaeological campaigns led to new catalogs of inscriptions that built upon Gesenius' prior efforts, e.g. Vaux's catalog from the campaigns of Davis (1863). At nearly the same time as each other, both Schröder (1869) and Euting (1871, 1883) produced basic lists of inscriptions, the latter with lithographs for nearly every stela. After a successful military/scholarly campaign in the Levant (1860-1861), Ernst Renan gained support from the AIBL to publish the first tome of the Corpus Inscripitionum Semiticarum, pars prima: Inscriptiones phoenicias continens (CIS I.1, 1881-1887). His definitive collection reshuffled the previous common order of inscriptions and incorporated newer texts gathered by Pricot de Sainte-Marie, by Delattre, and by Reinach & Babelon, etc. This Corpus did have some glaring omissions, however, lacking many well-known inscriptions from funerary contexts (e.g. Carthaginensis octava), lacking many well-known Neo-Punic insciptions, and lacking many inscriptions from North Africa found outside of Carthage (e.g. from Cirta / Constantine, Judas 1857, 1861, 1866, cf. Punica XVIII, Berthier & Charlier 1952-1955 and Bertrandy & Sznycer 1987). Although the AIBL did publish a wider range of inscriptions prior to their inclusion in the CIS, as part of the series Répertoire d'épigraphie sémitique (RÉS), many still remained outside of the Corpus when publication was suspended after the final fasicules of the CIS I.3 (1962) and RÉS (texts: VII 1950; indices: VIII 1968). Besides such inadequacies in coverage, the Corpus can be found only in a few university libraries, it often lacks clear images, and it presents commentary in no-longer-accessible scholastic Latin.

  Among the well-known stelae notably absent from the CIS are those from Hadrumetum (mod. Sousse) that Euting had recorded (see below). Certain studies have produced full lists detailing Hadrumetum stelae now in the Louvre, in the Bardo, and in the Musée archéologique de Sousse, including those inscriptions more recently excavated (e.g. Fantar 1995; Bénichou-Safar 2010, 2016), yet they lack the current status of those extracted by Euting. We now have confirmation that the stelae were acquired by the State Hermitage in St. Petersburg, namely as a donation made in gratitude for the publication of his Punische Steine (Yunusov 2018), and we have specific registry numbers from their accession into the Department of the Ancient Orient (Древний Восток), as reproduced below. Yunusov published only three images of anepigraphic stelae—two still encased in their plaster moulds—but the museum does have a multi-year program in place for conservation and publication of the entire Euting donation.
18756 18757 18761
 ДВ 18756  ДВ 18757  ДВ 18761 Yunusov 2018: 274-275 pl.I-III

thumbs 
 St. Petersburg 
State Hermitage
 

CIS / KAI 
  Euting PSt (Punische Steine)
    SCI (Sammlung der carthagischen Inschriften)
ДВ 18760   Hadrumetensis 1
  PSt Taf.XXIX; SCI Anhang Taf.1
ДВ 18733   Hadrumetensis 2
  PSt Taf.XXIX; SCI Anhang Taf.2
ДВ 18759   Hadrumetensis 3
  PSt Taf.XXX; SCI Anhang Taf.3
ДВ 18732   Hadrumetensis 4
  PSt Taf.XXX; SCI Anhang Taf.4
ДВ 18754   Hadrumetensis 5
  PSt Taf.XXXI; SCI Anhang Taf.5
ДВ 18747   Hadrumetensis 6
  PSt Taf.XXXI; SCI Anhang Taf.6
ДВ 18744  KAI 97   Hadrumetensis 7
  PSt Taf.XXXII; SCI Anhang Taf.7
ДВ 18735   Hadrumetensis 8
  PSt Taf.XXXII; SCI Anhang Taf.8
- - -   KAI 98   Hadrumetensis 9
  PSt Taf.XXXII; SCI Anhang Taf.9
ДВ 18738   Neopunica 121
  PSt Taf.XXXIX
ДВ 18753  CIS I.0388   Carthaginensis 121
  PSt Taf.III; SCI Taf.71
ДВ 18741  CIS I.0420   Carthaginensis 234
  PSt Taf.XLIII; SCI Taf.132
ДВ 18748  CIS I.0551   Carthaginensis 128
  PSt Taf.V; SCI Taf.74
ДВ 18742  CIS I.2033   Carthaginensis 189
  PSt Taf.XI; SCI Taf.109
ДВ 18758  CIS I.2040   Carthaginensis 218
  PSt Taf.XXIV; SCI Taf.122
ДВ 18752  CIS I.2041   Carthaginensis 219
  PSt Taf.XXIV; SCI Taf.123
ДВ 18762  CIS I.2042   Carthaginensis 220
  PSt Taf.XXV; SCI Taf.124
ДВ 18745  CIS I.2043   Carthaginensis 221
  PSt Taf.XXV; SCI Taf.125
ДВ 18739  CIS I.2044   Carthaginensis 222
  PSt Taf.XXVI; SCI Taf.126
ДВ 18736  CIS I.2045   Carthaginensis 223(=193)
  PSt Taf.XXVI; SCI Taf.126
ДВ 18737  CIS I.2047   Carthaginensis 225
  PSt Taf.XXVII; SCI Taf.127
ДВ 18731  CIS I.2049   Carthaginensis 230
  PSt Taf.XLI; SCI Taf.130
ДВ 18734  CIS I.2050   Carthaginensis 231
  PSt Taf.XLI; SCI Taf.130
ДВ 18743  CIS I.2051   Carthaginensis 232
  PSt Taf.XLII; SCI Taf.131
ДВ 18751  CIS I.2052   Carthaginensis 233
  PSt Taf.XLII; SCI Taf.131
ДВ 18755  CIS I.2053   Carthaginensis 235
  PSt Taf.XLIII; SCI Taf.132
ДВ 18750  CIS I.2054   Carthaginensis 236
  PSt Taf.XLIV; SCI Taf.133
ДВ 18740  CIS I.2055   Carthaginensis 237
  PSt Taf.XLIV; SCI Taf.133
ДВ 4991  anepigraphicus 
ДВ 5329  Punic letters? 
ДВ 18746  anepigraphicus 
ДВ 18749  anepigraphicus 
ДВ 18756  anepigraphicus 
ДВ 18757  anepigraphicus 
ДВ 18761  anepigraphicus